Conflict Theory


Slides: conflict and critical theory.pdf conflict and critical theory.pptx

Does social conflict indicate a society is not "healthy"?
For Marx, conflict (class conflict in particular) is the "engine of history"
For Durkheim, conflict would be considered a normal property of societies in some measure.
For Weber, too, conflict would be seen as normal — he saw power, and struggles over and for power, as fundamental social processes.

Bottom line here is that you can't unequivocally find the "opposite" of critical theory in the classics — though Durkheim usually gets the most blame if somebody is going to get it.

In his preface to part three, "The Golden Moment 1945-1963," Lemert suggests we can identify three strands in mid-century sociology (281.2):
affirming the status quo
objecting to

1940s and 1950s. "Radical" critique of emerging post-war modernity. Adorno & Horkheimer. Reisman. Mass society as object of critique. Interestingly, orientation is about the loss of foundation of Western culture (H&A). Loss of American character to "other directed conformity" (R). Potentially conservative. Roots of neo-conservatism.

Erikson: identity crisis as normal.

Goffman: social interaction is performance.

Lacan & Beauvoir: invention of the OTHER. Then colonialism. Then race. etc.

Mills against "mindless empiricism and abstract theorizing"

Power elite.

Port Huron statement


Giddens talking about Marx, Weber, and Durkheim

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License